The Ultimate Model United Nations Vocabulary Glossary

Master MUN with our comprehensive Model United Nations vocabulary glossary. Get clear definitions, practical examples, and essential terms to excel in debate.

Welcome to the ultimate Model United Nations vocabulary glossary! This is your go-to resource for mastering the language of diplomacy. Getting a handle on the key terms is the first step in moving from a quiet observer to a delegate who truly shapes the debate. This guide gives you clear definitions, real-world examples, and strategic tips for all the words you'll hear in committee.

Why Mastering MUN Terminology Is Your First Step to Success

notion image
Model UN isn't just about public speaking; it’s a full-on simulation with its own distinct rules, procedures, and language. Knowing this vocabulary isn't just a nice-to-have—it's absolutely essential if you want to participate effectively. Without it, you could easily get lost in the flow of debate, miss your chance to speak, or struggle to get your ideas into a resolution.
Think of MUN vocabulary as your diplomatic toolkit. Knowing the difference between a "Point of Order" and a "Point of Inquiry" means you can navigate the committee's rules with total confidence. Understanding terms like "caucus," "bloc," and "yield" is how you build alliances and push your country’s agenda forward. This glossary is designed to be your quick reference so you’re always ready for what comes next.

The Foundation of Global Communication

The need for a shared vocabulary becomes crystal clear when you think about how big MUN has become. With over 400,000 students jumping into conferences around the world every year, a common language is what allows delegates from completely different backgrounds to communicate and collaborate. This specialized language cuts through cultural and linguistic barriers, creating a fair and smooth simulation of global diplomacy.
This guide is here to break down all those complex terms into simple, easy-to-digest definitions. Whether you're a first-timer or a seasoned delegate just needing a quick refresh, this Model United Nations vocabulary glossary is your key to performing at your best. For a wider look at the activity, feel free to check out our complete guide to Model United Nations.

Top 10 Must-Know MUN Terms at a Glance

To get you started on the right foot, here’s a quick-reference table of the most critical terms you'll hear the moment you step into the committee room. Nail these down, and you'll be ready to follow along from the very first gavel.
Term
Brief Definition
Primary Use Case
Dais
The staff running the committee, led by the Chair.
Overseeing debate, ruling on motions, and managing the overall flow.
Caucus
A break in formal debate for either informal discussion (unmoderated) or topic-specific speeches (moderated).
Negotiating with delegates and drafting resolutions.
Motion
A formal proposal made by a delegate to take a certain action.
Proposing to start a caucus, move to a vote, or adjourn the session.
Yield
To give up the remainder of your speaking time.
Handing over your time to another delegate, the chair, or for questions.
Bloc
A group of countries that share similar views on the topic.
Working together to write and promote a draft resolution.
Resolution
The formal document that details the committee's proposed solutions.
The final output of the committee's work.
Sponsor
A primary author and promoter of a draft resolution.
Actively writing, advocating for, and answering questions on a resolution.
Signatory
A delegate who wants to see a draft resolution debated, without necessarily agreeing with it.
Showing enough support to bring a draft resolution to the floor for discussion.
Procedural
Anything related to the rules and procedures of the committee.
Voting on how the committee operates (e.g., setting the speaking time).
Substantive
Anything related to the actual topic being debated.
Voting on the content of resolutions and amendments.
Knowing these ten terms will give you a solid foundation for participating confidently and effectively in any committee.

Core Concepts and Committee Structure

notion image
Before you can get into the nitty-gritty of debate, you need to understand the room itself. Every Model UN committee operates on a fundamental structure that dictates who's in charge, who's participating, and what needs to happen before any real work can begin. Getting a handle on these roles and rules is your first step to becoming an effective delegate.
At its core, a committee is just a room full of delegates representing their assigned countries, all focused on a specific topic. But to keep things from descending into chaos, a neutral body manages the proceedings, and the debate can only start once a few key conditions are met. This framework ensures every discussion is fair, orderly, and, hopefully, productive.

Key Roles Within the Committee

Knowing the hierarchy tells you who to listen to, who to address, and what everyone's job is. There are three main roles that run every session.
  • Dais: This isn't one person, but the group of individuals running the committee, usually seated on a raised platform at the front of the room. Think of them as the committee's leadership team.
    • Example: "The Dais has ruled the motion out of order and will now move to the next speaker."
  • Chair (or Chairperson): The big boss. The Chair is the head of the Dais and has the final say on everything. They moderate debate, make sure everyone follows the rules of procedure, and rule on all motions and points.
    • Example: "The Chair recognizes the delegate from Japan to speak."
  • Rapporteur: This member of the Dais is the Chair's right hand, handling the administrative side of things. They're the ones tracking the speakers list, taking roll call, and counting every vote.
    • Example: "The Rapporteur will now read the results of the procedural vote."
Of course, the most numerous and essential role is the Delegate—that's you! As a representative of a member state or organization, your job is to advocate for your country's policies, engage in debate, and work with others to write and pass resolutions.

Foundational Committee Principles

Beyond the people, a few core principles govern how a committee actually gets down to business. These terms from our Model United Nations vocabulary glossary are critical for launching and directing the debate.
First up is the Agenda, which is simply the list of topics the committee is there to discuss. The very first order of business in any conference is for the committee to vote on which topic to tackle first.
Next, you'll hear the term Quorum. This refers to the minimum number of delegates that must be in the room for the committee to start its formal work. The Chair will take attendance (roll call) at the very beginning of the conference to make sure quorum is met, which is usually one-third or one-quarter of the total members. Without quorum, you can't do much besides debate procedural matters.
Finally, the Country Matrix is a list of all member states assigned to your committee. This is an incredibly useful document for seeing who's in the room at a glance and planning your strategy. While this setup is standard, some specialized committees, like crisis simulations, shake things up with unique roles. You can learn more about these fast-paced formats by exploring what is an ad hoc committee.
In any Model UN committee, the rules of procedure are the engine that keeps the debate moving. Getting a handle on them is like learning the traffic laws in a new city—once you know them, you can navigate the session with confidence and strategy. When you master motions, points, and yields, you gain the power to guide the debate, steer conversations toward your country's goals, and make sure your voice is heard when it matters most.
Think of these rules as separating the what of the debate (the substance) from the how (the process). Before you can even get into the nitty-gritty of a crisis or start drafting a resolution, your committee has to follow a structured path. This part of our Model United Nations vocabulary glossary will walk you through the procedural terms you simply have to know.

The Foundation of Formal Debate

The default setting for any committee is formal debate, which runs on the Speakers' List. It’s simply an ordered list of delegates who want to make a speech. As soon as the agenda is set, the Chair will open the Speakers' List, and it pretty much stays open for the rest of the conference.
A Motion is your primary tool for changing what the committee is doing. It’s a formal request to take a specific action, like breaking into a caucus or moving to a vote. Most of the time, a simple majority is all you need for a motion to pass.
  • Substantive Matters: These are the big-ticket items directly related to your agenda topics. Voting on draft resolutions or amendments falls into this category.
  • Procedural Matters: This is everything related to the process of the debate itself. Think of motions to start a caucus or to change the speaking time.
Here's a key difference: you can't abstain on procedural votes. You have to vote either for or against the motion.

Mastering Points to Maintain Order

Points are special procedural tools that can interrupt a speaker or the general flow of debate. They're absolutely crucial for making sure rules are followed, clearing up confusion, or addressing personal needs. Knowing when and how to raise a point is a hallmark of a seasoned delegate.
  1. Point of Personal Privilege: This is the only point that can interrupt a speaker. Use it only when you're experiencing a personal discomfort that's getting in the way of your participation. Maybe you can't hear the speaker, or the room is freezing cold.
      • Example: "Point of Personal Privilege. Could the delegate please speak into the microphone?"
      • Tip: Never, ever use this to disagree with what a speaker is saying. It’s strictly for matters of personal comfort.
  1. Point of Order: You raise a Point of Order when you think a rule of procedure has been broken, either by another delegate or even by the Chair. The Chair will then decide if your point is "well-taken" (correct) or "not well-taken" (incorrect).
      • Example: "Point of Order. The delegate is debating the content of the resolution, but we are currently in a procedural debate."
  1. Point of Parliamentary Inquiry: This is your go-to when you have a question for the Chair about the rules. It's purely for clarification, not to challenge a decision. If you have a question for another delegate about their speech, you'll want to learn more about a Point of Information and how it’s used in different MUN circuits.
      • Example: "Point of Parliamentary Inquiry. What is the required majority for this motion to pass?"

Strategic Use of Yielding

So, you’ve finished your speech from the Speakers' List, but there's still time left on the clock. You have to get rid of that time, and you do that by Yielding. You have three options, and your choice can be a subtle but powerful strategic move.
Here are your three options for yielding:
  • Yield to the Chair: This is the simplest and most common choice. You just give your remaining time back to the Chair, who then moves to the next person on the Speakers' List. It's perfect if you're out of time or have said everything you need to.
  • Yield to Another Delegate: You can pass your remaining time to another delegate, usually an ally, giving them the floor immediately. Just remember, the delegate you yield to can't turn around and yield that time again.
  • Yield to Questions (or Points of Information): This opens the floor for other delegates to ask you questions about your speech. The Chair will call on delegates, and the time for both the question and your answer gets deducted from what you have left. It’s an excellent way to clarify your stance and show everyone you know your stuff.

Mastering Debate and Caucusing

notion image
While the formal speeches from the Speakers' List get the conference started, the real deal-making in Model UN happens when you suspend that rigid structure. This is where caucusing comes in—the heart of negotiation, alliance-building, and real progress. To navigate a committee session effectively, you absolutely have to understand the different modes of debate.
Think of the committee experience as having two main gears. Formal Debate is the structured, one-by-one process of delivering speeches from the Speakers' List. On the other hand, Informal Debate covers all the caucusing periods where delegates break from that order to speak more freely. The best delegates know how to shift between these two gears to move their agenda forward.

Driving the Discussion with a Moderated Caucus

A Moderated Caucus is your tool for drilling down into a specific issue. It’s a temporary pause in formal debate where the Chair facilitates a faster, more focused discussion on a single sub-topic. Instead of broad speeches, you get a rapid-fire exchange of ideas.
To get one started, you’ll need to make a motion with three key details: the total time for the caucus, the speaking time for each delegate, and the precise topic you want to discuss.
  • Example Motion: "The delegate of Brazil moves for a 10-minute moderated caucus with a 45-second speaking time per speaker for the purpose of discussing potential solutions for water sanitation in rural areas."
This format is fantastic for quickly finding out where other countries stand, identifying potential allies, and introducing your core ideas when you need the room’s full attention. You need to be sharp and concise to make an impact here.

The Art of Negotiation in an Unmoderated Caucus

If moderated caucuses are for focused debate, the Unmoderated Caucus is where the real diplomacy happens. This is your chance to get out of your seat, move around the room, and talk directly to other delegates. It’s the engine room of the committee, where you'll be doing most of your negotiation, forming alliances, and actually writing resolutions.
These sessions are the lifeblood of collaboration. Delegates with similar policy goals will naturally gravitate toward each other to form a Bloc—a group of countries working together on a single resolution. The main goal here is to build Consensus, or widespread agreement, so your draft resolution has the votes to pass. This entire process is often called lobbying, and you can dive deeper into effective tactics in our guide on what lobbying is in MUN.

The Foundation of Your Argument: Position Papers

Long before you even enter the committee room, your strategy starts with your Position Paper. This is a short, focused essay laying out your country's stance on the topics at hand. It’s not just homework; it’s your personal playbook and the bedrock of every speech and negotiation you’ll engage in.
A solid position paper always includes:
  • A quick intro to the topic from your country's unique perspective.
  • Your nation's history with the issue, including past actions and policies.
  • The specific solutions and proposals you intend to champion in committee.
A well-researched position paper gives you instant credibility. It proves your arguments are rooted in actual policy and provides a clear roadmap for your entire conference. Every speech you give and every point you negotiate should connect back to this foundational document.

The Language of Resolutions and Documents

The whole point of a Model UN committee is to produce a solution, and that solution takes the form of a resolution. This is the document where all your research, debate, and backroom negotiations finally come together. Getting the language and structure right isn't just a formality—it's the core of the committee's work.
Think of this part of our Model United Nations vocabulary glossary as your guide to the entire lifecycle of a resolution. We'll cover everything from scribbling initial ideas on a Working Paper to the final vote on a polished Draft Resolution. These are the terms that help turn your ideas into official UN policy.

The Lifecycle of an Idea

A resolution doesn't just appear out of thin air. It begins as a simple idea, usually shared between delegates during an unmod cauc. When you find others who see the problem the same way you do, you start collaborating. This is how a concept makes its way to becoming formal policy.
  • Working Paper: This is where it all starts. A working paper is basically a shared document for your bloc to dump ideas, outline solutions, and get organized. It has no official format and is just a tool to get your thoughts in order before you start drafting something more formal.
  • Draft Resolution: Once your working paper has gained some traction and you've hammered it out into the proper UN format, it graduates to a draft resolution. At this stage, you can formally introduce it to the committee and open it up for debate.
  • Merger: It’s common for two or more blocs to come up with similar draft resolutions. Instead of letting them compete and split the vote, you can combine them. A Merger joins multiple draft resolutions into a single, more powerful one, which dramatically improves its chances of passing.

Anatomy of a Resolution

Every resolution is built in two main parts: the preamble and the operative clauses. Each section has a distinct job to do and even uses its own special set of introductory verbs. If you get this wrong, your document won't be taken seriously by the chair or other delegates.
By the way, a great way to make your clauses more compelling is to back them up with solid data. Effectively using statistics in MUN isn't just about dropping numbers; it's about interpreting them to tell a story—for example, explaining how waterborne diseases disproportionately harm children under five. You can discover insights on using MUN facts and figures at MUNPrep.org to learn more about this skill.
Preambulatory Clauses (the "Why"): These clauses set the stage. They explain the history of the problem, reference past UN actions, and state the core principles that justify your solutions. Think of them as the introduction. Each one starts with an italicized or underlined verb and ends with a comma.
Operative Clauses (the "What"): This is the action plan. Operative clauses detail the concrete steps your committee wants to take to solve the issue. Each clause is numbered, begins with a strong action verb, and ends with a semicolon (except for the very last one, which gets a period). For a complete walkthrough of this format, check out our guide on how to write MUN resolutions.
To keep things clear, here’s a quick look at the kinds of verbs you’ll use for each type of clause.

Preambulatory vs Operative Clause Verbs

Clause Type
Purpose
Example Verbs
Preambulatory
Provides context and justification for action.
Acknowledging, Affirming, Bearing in mind, Deeply concerned, Emphasizing, Recalling
Operative
States the specific actions or policies to be implemented.
Calls upon, Condemns, Designates, Encourages, Recommends, Urges, Requests
Choosing the right verb is a small detail that shows you know what you’re doing and lends your document instant credibility.

Key Roles and Actions

Getting your draft resolution formally debated requires you to gather support from other delegations. How much a delegate supports your paper determines their official role.
  • Sponsors: These are the main authors and driving force behind a draft resolution. As a sponsor, you are part of the core bloc that created the document, you fully support it, and you're expected to vote "yes" on it.
  • Signatories: Signatories are delegates who simply want to see the draft resolution debated. Signing a resolution does not mean you agree with it. It just means you think it's a worthwhile idea to discuss in committee. You can absolutely sign a resolution and then vote against it later.
Once a draft resolution is on the floor and being debated, delegates can propose changes. This is done through an Amendment, which is a formal motion to add, remove, or alter a specific part of a clause. Amendments are voted on one by one before the committee votes on the entire resolution, giving everyone a chance to fine-tune the document before the final decision.

Understanding Voting Procedures and Final Actions

All the speeches, caucusing, and late-night negotiations come down to one thing: the vote. This is the moment of truth where a draft resolution either becomes committee policy or a historical footnote. Mastering the rules and terminology of this final phase is non-negotiable if you want to see your hard work pay off.
The entire dynamic of the room shifts when committee moves into voting procedure. This formal transition happens after a Motion for the Previous Question passes, which immediately halts all debate on a specific draft resolution. Because this motion silences any further discussion, it's a big deal and requires a two-thirds majority to pass.

Methods of Voting

Once debate is closed, the Chair will decide how to conduct the vote. The two main ways you'll see this happen have different levels of formality, and Chairs choose the one that best fits the situation.
  • Voting by Acclamation: Think of this as the express lane. The Chair will ask if there are any objections, and if the room is silent, the resolution passes instantly. It’s typically reserved for procedural matters or resolutions so popular that a formal count would be a waste of time.
  • Roll Call Vote: This is the standard procedure for any significant vote on amendments or draft resolutions. The Rapporteur will call on each delegation one by one, in alphabetical order, and you must state your vote clearly. It’s formal, it’s transparent, and it puts every country's position on the official record.
The entire process, from a few scribbled notes to a document ready for a roll-call vote, follows a clear path.
notion image
As you can see, a document has to evolve from an informal working paper into a formally submitted draft resolution before it ever faces the final judgment of a vote.
When the Rapporteur calls your country’s name during a roll call vote, you have a few choices. Each one sends a different political message.
You have four main options:
  1. Yes: A clear vote supporting the draft resolution.
  1. No: A clear vote opposing the draft resolution.
  1. Abstain: This is a neutral stance. You’re choosing not to vote for or against it, which can signal that you don’t fully support the text but don’t want to block it either. Abstentions don't count towards the final vote tally.
  1. Pass: If you say "pass" the first time your country is called, you're essentially buying time. The Rapporteur will skip you and complete the rest of the list, then come back to all the delegations that passed. This lets you see the political landscape before committing.
In specialized committees like the Security Council, a few members have a game-changing power: the Veto. This allows any of the five permanent members (P5) to kill a substantive resolution with a single "No" vote, no matter how many other delegations vote in favor.
Finally, if you find yourself in a situation where you like parts of a resolution but can't stand others, you can make a Motion to Divide the Question. If it passes, the committee gets to vote on individual clauses or sections separately, allowing you to pass the good parts while ditching the controversial ones.

Common Questions About MUN Vocabulary

Let's be honest, Model UN has its own language. When you're new, a few terms can really trip you up in the heat of committee. This section is here to clear up some of the most common points of confusion.
Getting these details right is more than just knowing the rules; it's about being a sharp, effective delegate. Think of this as your quick-reference guide for making the right call when the pressure's on.

What Is the Difference Between a Sponsor and a Signatory

This is probably the number one question new delegates ask, and the difference is crucial. A sponsor is an author of a draft resolution. You've been in the trenches, writing and editing the document. You believe in every clause and are committed to getting it passed. If you're a sponsor, you must vote 'yes' on your own resolution.
A signatory, however, is just a delegate who wants the resolution to be discussed. That's it. Signing a paper doesn't mean you agree with it or promise to vote for it; it just means you think it’s a valid idea worth debating. You can absolutely be a signatory and later vote 'no'.

When Should I Use a Point of Order Versus a Point of Parliamentary Inquiry

Knowing when to use each of these points is a core procedural skill that shows the Chair you know what you're doing. Both are ways to communicate with the dais, but they have completely different functions.
  • Point of Order: You use this when you see a rule being broken. Someone speaking out of turn? The Chair skipping a procedural step? That's when you raise your placard and say, "Point of Order." You are actively correcting a mistake in the proceedings.
  • Point of Parliamentary Inquiry: This is for when you are the one who's unsure about a rule. You're asking the Chair for a quick clarification, not pointing out an error. For instance: "Point of Parliamentary Inquiry, what is the speaking time for this moderated caucus?"

What Is the Strategic Advantage of an Unmoderated Caucus

Formal debate is important, but the real work of MUN—the negotiation, the horse-trading, the alliance-building—happens during an unmoderated caucus. Its strategic advantage is simple: freedom. You get to leave your seat and talk directly with other delegates without the strict rules of a Speakers' List.
This is your time to huddle with your bloc, merge your working papers with another group's, and go around the room collecting the signatures you need. A well-timed motion for an unmod, especially after some new ideas have hit the floor, can give your group the breathing room it needs to hash out the final details of a resolution and lock in your support before voting.
Are you ready to walk into your next conference fully prepared? Model Diplomat is your AI-powered co-delegate, offering research assistance, speech writing help, and strategic guidance to make you a standout delegate. Get the edge you need by visiting us at https://modeldiplomat.com.