Explore conflict resolution strategies for Model UN: practical, debate-tested tips to craft resolutions, negotiate alliances, and win more votes.

Do not index

In the high-stakes world of Model United Nations, the ability to navigate disagreement is not just a skill-it's your greatest asset. While passionate debate and strong national positions are the lifeblood of any committee, true diplomatic mastery is demonstrated when delegates transform clashes into consensus. This isn't about simply winning an argument; it's about building coalitions, drafting effective resolutions, and finding common ground where none seems to exist.

Many delegates hit diplomatic walls that stall progress and lead to frustration. The key to unlocking your potential lies in a deep, practical understanding of effective conflict resolution strategies. This is where raw passion meets structured technique. Success requires more than just knowing your country's policy; it demands a well-researched and articulated position. For delegates looking to excel in crafting their position papers and resolutions, understanding effective research paper writing tips is crucial for building a solid foundation before entering the committee room.

This guide moves beyond theory, offering a comprehensive toolkit designed for the unique pressures of an MUN conference. We will explore 12 distinct and actionable frameworks, ranging from classic negotiation and mediation to advanced approaches like transformative dialogue and restorative justice. Each strategy is broken down with specific implementation advice and contextual examples tailored to MUN scenarios. Prepare to learn the techniques that separate good delegates from award-winning diplomats, equipping you to turn gridlock into a breakthrough in your next committee session.

1. Negotiation

Negotiation is the cornerstone of diplomacy and one of the most fundamental conflict resolution strategies. It involves direct communication between two or more parties to reach a mutually acceptable agreement, avoiding the need for third-party intervention. This process is about exploring differing viewpoints, identifying underlying interests, and collaboratively crafting a solution that satisfies the core needs of all involved.

This strategy is effective when parties have a degree of trust and are willing to engage in good-faith dialogue. In Model UN, negotiation is constant, from informal lobbying sessions to formal caucuses where delegates hammer out the details of a draft resolution.

How to Implement Negotiation

Effective negotiation requires more than just stating your country's position. It demands preparation, empathy, and strategic thinking.

Prepare Thoroughly: Before entering a discussion, understand your own interests, red lines, and potential concessions. Equally important, research the other parties' likely goals and constraints. This preparation prevents you from being caught off-guard.

Focus on Interests, Not Positions: A position is what you want (e.g., "We demand a 20% reduction in carbon emissions"). An interest is the "why" behind it (e.g., "Our coastal cities are at risk from rising sea levels"). Focusing on interests opens up more creative solutions that can satisfy everyone's underlying needs.

Generate Multiple Options: Avoid locking into a single solution early on. Brainstorm a variety of potential outcomes with other delegates. This collaborative approach, often called "expanding the pie," can reveal win-win scenarios you hadn't considered. The use of technology is also transforming this process; for further reading, explore how AI tools are shaping modern diplomatic negotiations.

2. Mediation

Mediation is a facilitated negotiation process where a neutral third party helps conflicting parties communicate and reach a mutually acceptable solution. Unlike a judge, the mediator does not impose a decision but instead guides the conversation, clarifies issues, manages emotions, and encourages collaborative problem-solving. This strategy introduces an impartial element to de-escalate tensions and rebuild lines of communication.

This approach is highly effective when direct negotiations have stalled or become too adversarial. In a Model UN context, the committee chair often acts as an informal mediator, guiding opposing blocs toward a consensus on a draft resolution. Organizations like the National Conflict Resolution Center have popularized this method for everything from workplace disputes to community conflicts.

How to Implement Mediation

Effective mediation hinges on the mediator's skill and the parties' willingness to engage constructively. It creates a structured environment for resolving complex disagreements.

Establish Neutrality and Trust: The mediator must be seen as impartial by all parties. Their role is to ensure the process is fair, not to take sides. This neutrality allows delegates to speak more openly without fear of judgment.

Facilitate Communication: A mediator’s primary job is to help parties listen to each other. They can reframe hostile statements into neutral language, ask clarifying questions, and ensure each side has a chance to present their perspective without interruption. This structured dialogue is a key component of conflict resolution strategies.

Guide Brainstorming: When parties are stuck, a mediator can prompt them to explore creative solutions. By asking open-ended questions and encouraging a focus on shared interests rather than entrenched positions, they can help uncover new avenues for agreement.

3. Collaboration (Win-Win)

Collaboration elevates conflict resolution from a zero-sum game to a value-creating exercise. Instead of just meeting in the middle, this strategy involves parties working together to find a solution that fully satisfies everyone's underlying interests. It’s a problem-solving approach rooted in the belief that a creative, integrated outcome exists that is better for all than any individual proposal.

This strategy thrives when the relationship between parties is important and the issues are too complex for simple trade-offs. In Model UN, collaboration is the engine behind comprehensive draft resolutions, where delegates from diverse blocs merge their core objectives to tackle a global problem from multiple angles, creating a stronger, more widely supported document.

How to Implement Collaboration

True collaboration requires a shift in mindset from adversarial to cooperative, focusing on mutual gain over individual victory.

Create a Safe Environment: Begin by establishing ground rules that encourage open, honest dialogue. All parties must feel safe to share their perspectives and concerns without fear of judgment. This psychological safety is foundational for creative problem-solving.

Identify Underlying Interests: Move beyond stated positions to uncover the fundamental needs and motivations of each party. Ask "why" to understand what each delegate or country truly hopes to achieve. This shared understanding is a critical step in finding common ground.

Brainstorm Solutions Jointly: Engage in a no-criticism brainstorming session to generate a wide range of potential solutions. The goal is to "expand the pie" before deciding how to divide it. This is often where the most innovative and mutually beneficial ideas emerge, similar to the creative deal-making that happens during effective lobbying in Model UN.

4. Compromise

Compromise is a pragmatic conflict resolution strategy where each party makes concessions to find an acceptable middle ground. Unlike collaboration which seeks a win-win, compromise is often a win-some, lose-some scenario. Both sides give up part of their desired outcome to reach an agreement, making it a valuable tool when a perfect solution is unattainable but a resolution is necessary.

This strategy is particularly effective in Model UN when time is short and the stakes are moderate, such as deciding on funding allocations for a program or setting a specific, non-critical target date. The goal is to move forward rather than remain deadlocked. A key element, as noted in the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, is that both parties have equal power and are committed to their goals.

How to Implement Compromise

Effectively reaching a compromise requires clear communication and a willingness to be flexible. It is about balancing gains and losses to achieve a workable outcome.

Identify Your Non-Negotiables and Concessions: Before entering discussions, clearly define what you absolutely must achieve and what you are willing to give up. This clarity allows you to make strategic concessions without sacrificing your core interests.

Seek a Middle Ground: The essence of compromise is meeting halfway. If one bloc wants a 10% reduction in arms and another wants 30%, a compromise might be a 20% reduction. Be prepared to propose and accept solutions that don't fully meet your initial demands.

Ensure Reciprocity: A successful compromise is a two-way street. Ensure that for every concession you make, the other party also makes a meaningful concession. This creates a sense of fairness and prevents one side from feeling they lost more than they gained. Documenting the specific trade-offs helps maintain clarity and commitment to the final agreement.

5. Arbitration

Arbitration is a more formalized conflict resolution strategy where an impartial third party, known as an arbitrator, hears arguments and evidence from all sides and then makes a binding decision. This process is essentially a private, simplified version of a trial, operating under agreed-upon rules. Unlike mediation where the third party facilitates a resolution, the arbitrator acts as a judge and their decision, or "award," is legally enforceable.

This strategy is ideal for disputes where a definitive, expert-driven decision is required without the cost and complexity of public court litigation. In the context of Model UN, delegates might reference real-world arbitration bodies like the Permanent Court of Arbitration when debating issues of international law, such as territorial disputes or trade disagreements, to propose a binding resolution mechanism.

How to Implement Arbitration

Successfully navigating arbitration requires rigorous preparation and a clear understanding of the process, which is less formal than court but more structured than negotiation.

Select the Right Arbitrator: The neutrality and expertise of the arbitrator are paramount. Parties should agree on an individual or panel with deep knowledge of the subject matter, whether it's international trade law or maritime boundaries. This ensures the final decision is well-informed.

Prepare Your Case Thoroughly: Treat arbitration as you would a formal legal proceeding. Gather all relevant documents, evidence, and witness testimony. A well-organized and compelling presentation of your position is crucial, as the arbitrator's decision will be based solely on the facts presented.

Understand the Procedural Rules: Arbitration is governed by rules, often set by institutions like the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or UNCITRAL. Familiarize yourself with these rules to understand timelines, submission requirements, and how evidence is presented. This procedural knowledge prevents tactical errors and ensures a fair hearing.

6. Accommodation (Smoothing)

Accommodation, also known as smoothing, is a conflict resolution strategy where one party yields to the other's needs, prioritizing the relationship over their own immediate interests. This approach involves setting aside personal goals to maintain harmony and avoid contention. It's a selfless act of cooperation, focusing on areas of agreement while downplaying differences to preserve goodwill.

This strategy is particularly useful when the issue at hand is far more important to the other party than it is to you, or when preserving a long-term alliance is paramount. In Model UN, a delegate might accommodate an ally on a minor clause in a resolution to secure their crucial vote for the entire document, understanding that the overall success outweighs the small concession.

How to Implement Accommodation

Successfully using accommodation requires strategic insight and a clear understanding of your long-term objectives. It is not about surrendering but about making a calculated choice for a greater gain.

Assess the Importance: Before accommodating, evaluate the stakes. Is the issue minor to your delegation but critical to your ally? If so, yielding can be a powerful tool for building political capital and strengthening partnerships for future, more significant debates.

Communicate Your Intent: Frame your accommodation as a deliberate gesture of goodwill, not as a sign of weakness. State clearly that you are yielding on this point to support the relationship and the shared larger goal. For example, "Though our delegation has reservations, we will support your amendment to ensure this resolution passes."

Know Your Limits: While one of the most useful conflict resolution strategies for building alliances, overuse can lead to your position being consistently overlooked. Use it selectively. Decide in advance which issues are non-negotiable and which are open for accommodation to avoid building resentment or being taken advantage of.

7. Avoidance (Withdrawal)

Avoidance is a passive conflict resolution strategy where a party chooses to sidestep, postpone, or completely withdraw from a conflict. This approach involves intentionally disengaging from the issue or the conflicting party, often with the hope that the problem will resolve itself or that a better time to address it will arise. It is a deliberate choice not to engage.

This strategy can be useful for trivial issues or when emotions are running too high for a productive conversation. In a Model UN context, a delegate might temporarily avoid a contentious clause during informal lobbying to focus on building consensus on less controversial points first, returning to the difficult topic later when more political capital has been built.

How to Implement Avoidance

Strategic avoidance is about timing and priority management, not permanent evasion. It requires a conscious decision to disengage for a specific, tactical reason.

Assess the Issue's Importance: Determine if the conflict is worth the time and energy to resolve. If the issue is minor and the stakes are low, avoidance might be the most efficient path, allowing you to conserve resources for more significant battles.

Use it to De-escalate: When a debate becomes overly heated and unproductive, stepping back can be a powerful move. Announce a temporary break or suggest tabling the discussion. This "cooling off" period allows all parties to regain composure and approach the problem more rationally later.

Set a Time to Re-engage: If you postpone a discussion, commit to a specific time to revisit it. Saying, "I can't discuss this now, but let's talk after the next session," shows respect for the issue while buying necessary time. This prevents avoidance from becoming neglect.

8. Competition (Assertiveness)

Competition, also known as assertiveness, is a conflict resolution strategy where one party pursues their own interests at the expense of others. Characterized by high assertiveness and low cooperation, this "win-lose" approach uses power, authority, or superior argument to achieve a desired outcome, often without regard for the opposing party's needs or the long-term health of the relationship. It is a forceful and direct method of handling disagreements.

This strategy is most appropriate in situations where a quick, decisive action is vital, or when fundamental principles are at stake and cannot be compromised. In Model UN, a delegate might use a competitive approach during a moderated caucus to forcefully advocate for a crucial clause, aiming to overpower opposition through sheer conviction and procedural knowledge, especially when time is running out.

How to Implement Competition

Using competition effectively requires a calculated understanding of when its benefits outweigh its significant relational costs. It should be deployed strategically, not as a default response.

Reserve for Urgent Decisions: This approach is best suited for emergencies or situations where a swift, unilateral decision is necessary for safety or to prevent a greater crisis. When debate is a luxury you cannot afford, assertiveness becomes a necessity.

Stand Firm on Non-Negotiables: When a core principle or a critical national interest is on the line, a competitive stance is required. This communicates that your position is a red line and not subject to compromise.

Understand the Relational Impact: Be fully aware that this strategy can damage relationships and create resentment. It prioritizes the issue over the people involved. If the long-term relationship is important, consider whether another strategy might be more suitable.

Follow Up to Mitigate Damage: After a competitive interaction, if the relationship must be maintained, make an effort to repair it. Acknowledge the difficult nature of the situation and explain why the assertive stance was necessary, which can help to mend bridges for future collaboration.

9. Restorative Justice

Restorative justice is a powerful conflict resolution strategy that shifts the focus from punishment to repairing harm and rebuilding relationships. Instead of asking what rule was broken and who should be punished, it asks who was harmed, what their needs are, and whose obligation it is to meet those needs. This approach brings together those affected by a conflict to collaboratively decide how to mend the damage and prevent future occurrences.

This method is particularly effective when preserving community or long-term relationships is a priority. In Model UN, this could be applied within a bloc after a major disagreement threatens its unity, or in post-conflict scenarios where reconciliation is the primary goal. It mirrors the work of real-world Truth and Reconciliation Commissions, which seek to heal national wounds after periods of widespread conflict.

How to Implement Restorative Justice

Applying a restorative justice framework requires a commitment to healing and mutual understanding, guided by a structured and empathetic process.

Create a Safe Space: The foundation of restorative justice is voluntary participation in a safe, facilitated environment. All parties, especially those who were harmed, must feel secure enough to express themselves honestly without fear of retaliation. A neutral facilitator is essential to guide the conversation.

Focus on Impact and Needs: The dialogue should center on the personal impact of the actions. The person who caused harm must listen to how their behavior affected others. This fosters empathy and a genuine understanding of the consequences, which is a crucial step toward accountability.

Collaboratively Determine Reparations: The group works together to decide what can be done to repair the harm. This is not about imposing a penalty but about creating a meaningful agreement that addresses the needs of the victims and helps the responsible party reintegrate into the community. Actions might include a public apology, restitution, or service.

10. Transformative Conflict Resolution

Transformative conflict resolution is a profound approach that prioritizes changing the quality of human interaction over simply reaching a settlement. Popularized by Bush and Folger in "The Promise of Mediation," this strategy focuses on two key dynamics: empowerment and recognition. The goal is not just to solve the immediate problem but to transform the relationship between the conflicting parties, fostering mutual understanding and respect.

This strategy shifts the focus from what people want to how they interact. It operates on the belief that conflict provides an opportunity for personal growth and relational change. In Model UN, this can be seen when two historically opposed blocs engage in a dialogue that moves beyond stated positions to genuinely acknowledge each other's security concerns or historical grievances, fundamentally altering the dynamic of committee debate.

How to Implement Transformative Conflict Resolution

Applying this strategy requires a patient and empathetic mindset, shifting the goal from "winning" to "understanding." It is one of the most sophisticated conflict resolution strategies because it deals with the human dimension of disputes.

Create Safe Spaces: The foundation of this approach is a safe, non-judgmental environment where delegates feel they can speak authentically without fear of reprisal. This could be a moderated, informal caucus dedicated solely to sharing perspectives.

Prioritize Recognition and Empowerment: Instead of pushing for a solution, a mediator or chair should focus on helping each party articulate their perspective clearly (empowerment) and encouraging others to acknowledge and understand that perspective, even if they disagree (recognition).

Embrace the Process: Acknowledge that a complete agreement may not be the outcome. The primary success is the transformation in how delegates perceive and interact with one another. This improved relationship can pave the way for future collaboration on other issues.

11. Interest-Based Relational (IBR) Approach

The Interest-Based Relational (IBR) approach is a sophisticated conflict resolution method that prioritizes both solving the problem at hand and preserving the long-term relationship between parties. Popularized by Roger Fisher and William Ury in their seminal work "Getting to Yes," this strategy moves beyond rigid positions to uncover the underlying interests, needs, and concerns motivating each side. By doing so, it creates space for collaborative, win-win solutions.

This approach is highly effective in complex, multi-stakeholder disputes where ongoing cooperation is essential, such as long-term environmental negotiations or peace-building initiatives. In Model UN, using IBR can distinguish you as a delegate focused not just on your country's immediate demands but on building sustainable, widely supported resolutions that strengthen international ties. It is a cornerstone of modern diplomatic practice.

How to Implement the Interest-Based Relational Approach

Implementing IBR requires a shift in mindset from adversarial debate to joint problem-solving. It's about being "hard on the problem, soft on the people."

Separate Interests from Positions: A position is a fixed demand ("We will not accept any resolution without a sanctions clause"). An interest is the reason behind it ("We need a mechanism to ensure compliance and protect regional stability"). Explicitly ask delegates "why" they hold a certain position to uncover these crucial underlying motivations.

Actively Listen and Validate Concerns: Show other parties you understand their perspective, even if you don't agree with it. Phrases like, "It sounds like your primary concern is economic security, is that correct?" build trust and encourage reciprocity. This validation is key to de-escalating tension.

Generate Multiple Options Before Deciding: Resist the urge to lock onto the first viable solution. Dedicate time in unmoderated caucuses to brainstorm a wide range of potential options that could satisfy the various interests identified. This collaborative process often reveals innovative compromises that were not initially obvious.

12. Dialogue and Communication Circles

Dialogue and Communication Circles are structured, facilitated processes designed to foster deep, authentic conversation. By bringing people together in a circular format, this strategy emphasizes equitable participation, active listening, and storytelling to build mutual understanding. This method transforms a debate into a shared exploration of perspectives, creating a safe space for honesty and vulnerability.

This approach is powerful when emotions are high or when a conflict is rooted in deep-seated values and historical grievances. In a Model UN context, a chair might use a modified circle format during an unmoderated caucus to de-escalate tensions between blocs, allowing delegates to share the core motivations behind their rigid positions and find common ground.

How to Implement Dialogue and Communication Circles

Successfully facilitating a circle requires creating an environment of trust and intentionality. The structure itself guides the conversation toward a more constructive and empathetic outcome.

Establish Clear Guidelines: Begin by co-creating ground rules with all participants. These often include speaking from personal experience ("I" statements), listening without interrupting, and maintaining confidentiality. These guidelines are crucial for building the necessary psychological safety.

Use a Talking Piece: A physical object, or "talking piece," is passed around the circle. Only the person holding the object may speak. This simple tool slows down the conversation, prevents interruptions, and ensures everyone has an opportunity to be heard fully, which can be a key part of these conflict resolution strategies.

Facilitate, Don't Dominate: The facilitator’s role is to hold the space, introduce thoughtful questions, and ensure the guidelines are followed, not to steer the conversation toward a specific outcome. Staying calm and centered is vital; for those new to facilitation, it is helpful to review tips on how to calm down before leading a high-stakes discussion.

Embrace Silence: Unlike a fast-paced debate, silence is a productive part of the circle process. It allows participants time for internal reflection and to process what has been shared, often leading to more thoughtful contributions.

12-Strategy Conflict Resolution Comparison

Method	Implementation complexity	Resource requirements	Expected outcomes	Ideal use cases	Key advantages
Negotiation	Low–Moderate (informal to structured)	Low (time, prep, communication)	Voluntary agreements; variable durability	Bilateral disputes, business deals, family matters	Cost-effective; preserves relationships; parties control outcome
Mediation	Moderate (facilitated process)	Mediator, time, confidential space	Mutually crafted solutions; usually non-binding unless agreed	Workplace, family, community, commercial disputes	Preserves relationships; higher satisfaction; faster than litigation
Collaboration (Win-Win)	High (integrative process)	Significant time, skilled facilitation, information sharing	Durable, creative solutions; strengthened relationships	Cross-functional problems, sustainability, long-term partnerships	Addresses root causes; fosters innovation and trust
Compromise	Low (quick negotiation)	Low (minimal facilitation)	Middle-ground agreements; moderate satisfaction	Time-sensitive or moderate-stakes disputes, resource splits	Fast and practical; easy to implement
Arbitration	Moderate–High (formal procedure)	Arbitrator fees, legal preparation, hearing facilities	Binding decision with limited appeal	Contractual and commercial disputes, employment arbitration	Finality and expertise; confidential and faster than courts
Accommodation (Smoothing)	Low (yielding approach)	Low (little prep or resources)	Short-term harmony; underlying issues often unresolved	Minor issues where relationships matter more than outcome	Quickly reduces tension; preserves relationships
Avoidance (Withdrawal)	Low (non-engagement)	Minimal (time to delay)	Temporary cooling-off; risk of escalation if prolonged	Trivial conflicts, need for reflection or delay	Prevents immediate escalation; buys time
Competition (Assertiveness)	Low–Moderate (forceful approach)	Authority, decisiveness; possible legal resources	Win–lose outcomes; quick decisive resolution	Crises, safety issues, enforcing non-negotiable principles	Rapid decisions; establishes authority and boundaries
Restorative Justice	High (facilitated, reparative)	Trained facilitators, preparation time, supportive structures	Repair of harm, accountability, reconciliation	Youth diversion, victim-offender processes, community healing	Reduces recidivism; promotes healing and community repair
Transformative Conflict Resolution	High (process-focused)	Skilled facilitators, long time, safe spaces	Relationship transformation and empowerment; agreement not guaranteed	Post-conflict dialogue, cultural or relational transformation	Deep relational change; respects autonomy and recognition
Interest-Based Relational (IBR) Approach	Moderate–High (structured problem-solving)	Skilled facilitators, time, structured process	Durable agreements addressing underlying interests	Labor-management, multi-party negotiations, diplomacy	Solves root causes; maintains and strengthens relationships
Dialogue and Communication Circles	Moderate (structured group process)	Facilitators, time, protocols, safe physical/psychological space	Deep mutual understanding, narrative sharing; hard to operationalize quickly	Racial justice, community healing, workplace culture work	Builds empathy, reduces polarization, creates safe space for voices

Synthesizing Your Diplomatic Toolkit for Success

The twelve powerful conflict resolution strategies detailed in this guide represent more than just a list of tactics; they form a comprehensive diplomatic toolkit. From the principled art of Negotiation to the community-focused principles of Restorative Justice, each method offers a unique lens through which to view and address the multifaceted challenges that arise in Model UN and beyond. Mastering these approaches is not about rote memorization but about developing situational awareness and diplomatic dexterity.

The true mark of a distinguished delegate is the ability to diagnose a conflict accurately and prescribe the most effective strategy. A heated debate on military intervention might require the firm, principled stance of Competition, while building a coalition for a humanitarian aid resolution demands the inclusive and creative spirit of Collaboration. The key is adaptability. The strategies you have explored are interconnected, often blending and evolving as a situation unfolds. A mediated discussion, for instance, might naturally transition into a collaborative session once common ground is established.

From Theory to Actionable Diplomacy

To truly integrate these concepts, you must move from passive understanding to active practice. As you prepare for your next conference, don't just research your country's policies; analyze the potential conflicts and consider which strategies would best serve your objectives.

Identify Underlying Interests: Before entering a debate, use the Interest-Based Relational (IBR) Approach to map out not just what other delegations want, but why they want it. This deeper understanding is the foundation for effective negotiation and collaboration.

Practice Active Listening: The success of Dialogue Circles and Mediation hinges on your ability to listen. Practice summarizing others' points to ensure you understand them before presenting your own. This simple act can de-escalate tension and build trust.

Know When to Adapt: Be prepared to shift your approach. If a competitive strategy leads to a stalemate, be ready to pivot to a Compromise or suggest a mediated caucus to break the deadlock. Flexibility is your greatest asset.

The Broader Impact of Mastering Conflict Resolution

The skills you hone in the committee room have profound real-world applications. The ability to navigate disagreements, build consensus, and find common ground is invaluable in any field, from international relations and law to business and community organizing. These conflict resolution strategies teach empathy, critical thinking, and structured communication, attributes that define effective leadership.

Even the foundational principles of resolving disputes can be adapted for different age groups and contexts. For educators and mentors looking to introduce these concepts to younger audiences, understanding how to simplify and apply them is crucial. There are many excellent resources that explore effective conflict resolution techniques for kids, demonstrating the universal importance of these skills. By mastering these methods yourself, you become not only a better delegate but also a potential mentor for the next generation of leaders.

Ultimately, your journey in Model UN is a laboratory for developing these essential life skills. Each debate, every resolution, and all interactions with fellow delegates are opportunities to refine your diplomatic toolkit. Embrace the complexity, learn from every stalemate, and celebrate every consensus built. By thoughtfully applying these conflict resolution strategies, you will not only excel in your conferences but also equip yourself to be a more effective, empathetic, and impactful agent of change in the world.

Ready to elevate your preparation and implement these strategies with precision? Model Diplomat leverages AI to provide you with the deep research, strategic insights, and policy analysis needed to master any topic. Visit Model Diplomat to see how our tools can help you confidently choose and execute the perfect conflict resolution strategy in your next committee.

Top 6 conflict resolution strategies for Model UN success